Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from WAO Journal and BioMed Central.

Open Access Open Badges Original research

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Loratadine-Betamethasone Oral Solution in the Treatment of Severe Pediatric Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Teolinda Mendoza de Morales1 and Francis Sánchez2*

Author Affiliations

1 Instituto de Otorrinolaringologia San Bernardino, Caracas, Venezuela

2 Policlinica Metropolitana, Caracas, Venezuela

For all author emails, please log on.

World Allergy Organization Journal 2009, 2:49-53  doi:10.1097/WOX.0b013e31819f2105

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:15 April 2009

© 2009 World Allergy Organization; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Allergic rhinitis is a highly prevalent condition, particularly among children, whose schoolwork and quality of life may be impaired by its symptoms.


In this prospective, multicenter study, children between 6 and 12 years old with a diagnosis of severe perennial allergic rhinitis received a combination of the nonsedating antihistamine loratadine and the corticosteroid betamethasone in an oral solution for 5 days.


The total nasal and ocular symptom score was significantly reduced from 11.4 (± 2.1) before treatment to 2.9 (± 2.4) after treatment (P < 0.01). Significant reductions (P < 0.01) were also observed for sneezing, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and ocular erythema and pruritus. No adverse events were reported, and no subject discontinued treatment.


The combination of loratadine and betamethasone in an oral solution was safe and effective as initial short-term treatment for symptoms of severe perennial allergic rhinitis in school-aged children.

etamethasone; loratadine; pediatric; perennial allergic rhinitis; quality of life

Original research

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a widespread health problem in Venezuela, with a reported prevalence as high as 39% [1,2]. Approximately 40% of children and adolescents have AR, although the actual figures may be higher because AR is frequently unrecognized and consequently left untreated [3]. The incidence of AR in children increases with age: Up to 14.9% of 6- and 7-year-old children and as high as 39.7% of 13-and 14-year-old children are affected by AR [4]. The risk of developing AR increases by a factor of 2 if a child has 1 atopic parent and by a factor of 4 if both parents are atopic [5]. Allergic rhinitis tends to be more common in boys than in girls up to the age of 15 years, after which the gender disparity usually ends [6].

School performance and quality of life (QoL) of children with AR are generally worse than those of children without the disorder. Children with AR tend to be more irritable and tired than those without AR and can therefore be inattentive and disruptive in the classroom [4]. In the United States, children are absent for more than 2 million school days annually because of AR. A study of adolescents (N = 1834) in the United Kingdom found that subjects with AR were 40% more likely than those in the control group to drop a grade in English, science, or math in their critically important final General Certificate of Secondary Education examinations, which are administered in the spring when AR symptoms occur, different from practice exams taken in the winter when symptoms were not present [7]. Allergic children are also prone to psychological problems such as low self-esteem, shyness, depression, anxiety, and fearfulness [8-10].

Perennial AR (PAR) is a year-round condition that is generally caused by indoor allergens such as dust mites, mold, cat dander, and cockroach allergens [11,12]. A study of adolescents and adults in the United Kingdom found that 56% of those with AR and 8% of the general population experienced PAR [6]. Perennial AR is associated with at least two of the following symptoms: nasal congestion, sneezing, and serous or seromucus hypersecretion. Congestion and mucus production (postnasal drip) predominate in most patients with PAR; sneezing, nasal pruritus, and aqueous rhinorrhea may be minimal [13]. Many patients with PAR may also be bothered by ocular (itchy, red, or watery eyes) or other non-nasal symptoms, such as headache, thirst, and poor concentration [8,14].

Two widely accepted guidelines recommend the use of a second-generation, nonsedating H1 antihistamine in combination with an intranasal corticosteroid (INS) for the treatment of PAR. Guidelines developed by the Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma Workshop recommend this combination as first-line therapy for PAR when congestion is the predominant symptom [15]. The European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology guidelines recommend this combination in children with PAR when neither treatment as monotherapy sufficiently controls symptoms [16].

The nonsedating antihistamine loratadine is a selective H1-receptor antagonist with a 24-hour duration of effect and a favorable adverse event (AE) profile [11]. In two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical studies with adults and adolescents, loratadine reduced both the nasal and ocular symptoms of PAR and was well-tolerated [17,18]. Loratadine has also been found to reduce nasal and ocular symptoms in children with AR [19,20] and to be safe in children as young as 2 years old [21]. The corticosteroid betamethasone has effectively controlled the nasal symptoms of PAR in a study extending over 28 days. Given its risk for systemic AEs during prolonged treatment, betamethasone is generally used as a short-term treatment for patients with PAR whose symptoms do not respond to other medications [22,23].

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an oral solution (1 mg/0.05 mg/1 mL) combining loratadine and betamethasone at doses of 10 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively, as initial, short-term treatment for school-aged children with severe PAR in Venezuela. Severe PAR was defined in this study as PAR that alters nasal airflow, interferes with daily activities, and affects QoL, learning, and sleep. This is the first study of an oral solution of these two agents for the treatment of PAR.


This open-label, prospective, multicenter, single-group clinical trial enrolled pediatric subjects presenting to otorhinolaryngology offices of participating clinics for symptoms related to AR. To be included, subjects had to be aged 6 to 12 years and in good general health, with no other relevant clinical conditions. They must also have had a clinical diagnosis of PAR, with the presence of 3 or more of the following symptoms: sneezing, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and ocular erythema or pruritus. Perennial AR was confirmed in approximately 40% of subjects with a positive skin prick test reaction or a radioallergosorbent test that was class 2 or higher to house dust mites or cat dander. Further, endoscopy of the upper airways was performed.

The diagnosis of PAR was based on Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma Workshop criteria for moderate to severe persistent AR (symptoms present > 4 days/wk and > 4 weeks/y, with one or more of the following characteristics: troublesome symptoms, sleep disturbance, impairment of daily activities/sports, and reduced productivity in school). Total symptom score for study admission was 8 or more (each symptom scored from 0 [none] to 3 [severe] with a total possible score of 15). Approximately 80% of the subjects reported PAR for > 1 year with symptoms present > 5 days/wk.

Subjects were excluded if they had coexisting chronic conditions (except for asthma, atopic dermatitis, and sinusitis), presence of systemic fungal infection, or cognitive or behavioral disturbance, if they were currently receiving oral or parenteral steroid treatment or concomitant phenobarbital, rifampicin, phenytoin (diphenylhydantoin), or ephedrine, or if they had known hypersensitivity to either loratadine or betamethasone.

The study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practices and was approved by each center's ethics committee. School-aged children who met the inclusion criteria and whose parents signed informed consent forms were admitted to the study (day 0). On days 1 to 5, participants received 10 mL of a loratadine (1 mg/mL)/betamethasone (0.05 mg/mL) oral solution once daily at approximately 8:00 AM. Children were evaluated on days 0 and 6. Individual and total symptom scores (main efficacy parameters) were registered at both visits. Tolerability was assessed by AE reports. No additional medications for the symptoms of AR were permitted during the study.

Data Analysis

The primary efficacy end point was reduction from baseline in total nasal and ocular symptoms, and individual symptoms (sneezing or nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, or ocular erythema or pruritus). Symptoms were rated on a 4-point scale for severity (0 = none; AEs3 = severe) and frequency (0 = none; 3 = 5 days/wk). Clinical response was evaluated by comparing symptom scores on day 0 and day 6 using the Student t test. Each subject served as his or her own control (analysis of difference before and after treatment).


A total of 100 subjects (69 boys) with a mean age of 9.73 (± 1.77) years were enrolled and included in the analysis (Table 1). Seventy-nine subjects cited pathologic evidence demonstrating that sinusitis (53%) or asthma (44%) was also present. Subjects' additional disorders are listed in Table 2.

Table 1. Subject Distribution by Age

Table 2. Additional Pathologic Conditions in Subject Population at Baseline

Two patients refused to participate in the study due to concerns about possible AEs; their results were not included.


The mean total symptom score (nasal and ocular symptoms) decreased from 11.4 ± 2.1 points at baseline to 2.9 ± 2.4 points after 5 days of treatment with the loratadinebetamethasone oral solution (P < 0.01) (Figure 1). Significant decreases (P < 0.01) from baseline were also reported for each individual symptom (sneezing, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and ocular erythema or pruritus), as shown in Figure 2. The greatest improvements in individual symptoms were seen with nasal congestion, with a difference of 1.92 points between the loratadinebetamethasone solution and placebo groups, and with sneezing, with a difference of 1.86 points.

thumbnailFigure 1. Total PAR symptom scores before (at baseline) and after 5 days of treatment with loratadine-betamethasone oral solution.

thumbnailFigure 2. Individual PAR symptom scores before (at baseline) and after 5 days of treatment with loratadine-betamethasone oral solution.


Subjects were instructed to return their medication bottles to the investigators at the completion of the study. All participants reported complete adherence to the treatment regimen.

Safety and Tolerability

No AEs were reported for any subject, and nobody withdrew from the study.


Allergic rhinitis is a common disease that can be extremely bothersome and, if not treated properly, can lead to significant comorbidities and impairment of patients' daily activities [4,24]. Children can be especially vulnerable to the deleterious effects of AR. Children with AR are prone to comorbid conditions such as asthma, rhinosinusitis, otitis media, and nasal polyposis [4]. They can also fall behind in their schoolwork, become isolated from their classmates, and experience psychological disorders such as depression and anxiety [7-10,25].

The rationale for combining an antihistamine with a corticosteroid is based on each drugs' mechanism of action in both the early and the late phases of allergic reaction. Antihistamines inhibit the release of H1 histamine from basophils and mast cells, which alleviates symptoms of sneezing, itching, and rhinorrhea [11,18,26]. By contrast, corticosteroids mitigate nasal blockage (a hallmark of congestion) induced by the chronic inflammatory process and a variety of mediators, which only partially respond to H1 antihistamines [11,23,27].

The loratadine-betamethasone oral solution evaluated in this study has the potential to control symptoms in both phases of the allergic reaction. Loratadine exerts an antihistaminic effect that is characterized by attenuation of symptoms resulting from histamine release in the nasal mucosa during the early-phase allergic reaction. Betamethasone has an anti-inflammatory effect, as suggested by the relief of nasal congestion during the late-phase reaction. These results demonstrate that this combination therapy in a liquid formulation provides rapid and continuing relief of nasal and non-nasal symptoms.

The results of this study corroborate those of a previous clinical trial in which loratadine and betamethasone were administered as joint therapy for AR. In this double-blind, parallel-group study in subjects (N = 299) with severe AR and clinically significant obstruction, loratadine and betamethasone were used in combination and individually. The combination was significantly more effective in controlling symptoms, including nasal obstruction, than either drug administered as monotherapy. Further, loratadine, administered with betamethasone, resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of relapse compared with the other treatment regimens [28].

Studies in which loratadine was combined with an INS have demonstrated similar results. Subjects receiving combined adjunctive treatment with loratadine and the INSs mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate showed significant improvements compared with those receiving placebo in nasal symptoms of AR and QoL [29,30].

An oral formulation, such as the one used in this study, may enhance patient compliance because many children find it difficult to swallow a tablet or use a nasal spray. Two clinical studies of a syrup formulation of loratadine given at doses of 5 mg and 10 mg to children as young as 3 years old found that loratadine reduced both nasal and non-nasal symptoms of seasonal AR and PAR and was well-tolerated [31,32].

Betamethasone was used in the solution at a relatively low dose of 0.5 mg. This is the same dosage used in the loratadine-betamethasone adjunctive treatment study cited above,[28] which was designed to be a study of low-dose betamethasone. As with other first-generation corticosteroids (eg, hydrocortisone, prednisolone, and dexamethasone), betamethasone has been associated with systemic AEs [23]. The use of a lower dose may have contributed to the insignificant AE profile of the loratadine-betamethasone solution. The absence of any AEs in this study also suggests that the solution may be well-tolerated during the repeated short courses needed in the treatment of children with severe PAR.

The interpretation of the results of this study is limited because it was not placebo-controlled; instead, comparison of results was made pre- and posttreatment, with each subject acting as his or her own control. Comparisons of pre- and posttreatment efficacy variables have been utilized in other studies which assessed the clinical impact of corticosteroids in adults and children with AR [33,34]. However, it is possible that, over the course of this study, subjects' symptoms may have abated independent of loratadine/betamethasone treatment as a result of regression to the mean.

Combination loratadine-betamethasone in an oral solution (1 mg/0.05 mg/1 mL) was a safe, well-tolerated, and effective initial, short-term treatment for severe PAR in children between 6 and 12 years old. No AEs were reported for any subject, and nobody withdrew from the study; thus, this formulation may be an appropriate option for short-term control of the symptoms of PAR. Additional investigation of this combination is required to determine its safety profile when used for repeated exacerbations of PAR.


Supported by Schering-Plough.


Editorial assistance was provided by Patricia C. Abramo; this assistance was funded by Schering-Plough.


  1. Carrasco E: Epidemiologic aspects of asthma in Latin America.

    Chest 1987, 91(June 1):93S-97S. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  2. Perdomo de Ponce D, Uribe M, Wolff I: Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis: their characterization in a tropical environment.

    Invest Clin 1990, 31(3):129-138. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  3. Berger WE: Allergic rhinitis in children: diagnosis and management strategies.

    Paediatr Drugs 2004, 6(4):233-250. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Blaiss MS, The Allergic Rhinitis in Schoolchildren Consensus Group: Allergic rhinitis and impairment issues in schoolchildren: a consensus report.

    Curr Med Res Opin 2004, 20(12):1937-1952. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. International Conference on Allergic Rhinitis in Childhood

    Allergy 1999, 54(suppl 55):4-34. OpenURL

  6. Sibbald B: Epidemiology of allergic rhinitis. In Epidemiology of Clinical Allergy: Monographs in Allergy. Edited by Burr ML. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1993:61-79. OpenURL

  7. Walker S, Khan-Wasti S, Fletcher M, Cullinan P, Harris J, Sheikh A: Seasonal allergic rhinitis is associated with a detrimental effect on examination performance in United Kingdom teenagers: case-control study.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 120(2):381-387. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Meltzer EO, Nathan RA, Selner JC, Storms W: Quality of life and rhinitic symptoms: results of a nationwide survey with the SF-36 and RQLQ questionnaires.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997, 99(6, suppl 1):815-819. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Tanner LA, Reilly M, Meltzer EO, Bradford JE, Mason J: Effect of fexofenadine HCl on quality of life and work, classroom, and daily activity impairment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    Am J Manag Care 1999, 5(4, suppl II):S235-S247. OpenURL

  10. Fireman P: Therapeutic approaches to allergic rhinitis: treating the child.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000, 105(6, suppl 1):616-621. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Bousquet J, van Cauwenberge P, Khaltaev N, for the ARIA Workshop Group and the World Health Organization: Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma: ARIA Workshop Report.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001, 108(5):S147-S334. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Bellanti JA, Wallerstedt DB: Allergic rhinitis update: epidemiology and natural history.

    Allergy Asthma Proc 2000, 21(6):367-370. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Skoner DP: Allergic rhinitis: definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, detection, and diagnosis.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001, 108(1):S2-S8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Juniper EF: Measuring health-related quality of life in rhinitis.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997, 99(2):S742-S749. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, et al.: Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 Update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA2LEN and Aller-Gen).

    Allergy 2008, 63(suppl 86):8-160. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C, Passalacqua G, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, et al.: Consensus statement on the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

    Allergy 2000, 55(2):116-134. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Bruttmann G, Charpin D, Germouty J, Horak F, Kunkel G: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of loratadine in perennial allergic rhinitis.

    J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989, 83(2 Pt 1):411-416. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  18. Frølund L, Etholm B, Irander K, Johannessen TA, Odkvist L, et al.: A multicentre study of loratadine, clemastine and placebo in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

    Allergy 1990, 45(4):254-261. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Boner AL, Richelli C, Castellani C, Marchesi E, Andreoli A: Comparison of the effects of loratadine and astemizole in the treatment of children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

    Allergy 1992, 47(2 Pt 1):98-102. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  20. Boner AL, Miglioranzi P, Richelli C, Marchesi E, Andreoli A: Efficacy and safety of loratadine suspension in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis.

    Allergy 1989, 44(6):437-441. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Salmun LM, Herron JM, Banfield C, Padhi D, Lorber R, Affrime MB: The pharmacokinetics, electrocardiographic effects, and tolerability of loratadine syrup in children aged 2 to 5 years.

    Clin Ther 2000, 22(5):613-621. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Harding SM, Heath S: Intranasal steroid aerosol in perennial rhinitis: comparison with an antihistamine compound.

    Clin Allergy 1976, 6(4):369-372. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Edwards TB: Effectiveness and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate, an intranasal corticosteroid, in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis.

    Clin Ther 1995, 17(6):1032-1041. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Juniper EF: Rhinitis management: the patient's perspective.

    Clin Exp Allergy 1998, 28(S6):34-38. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Richards W: Preventing behavior problems in asthma and allergies.

    Clin Pediatr 1994, 33(10):617-624. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Gentile DA, Friday GA, Skoner DP: Management of allergic rhinitis: antihistamines and decongestants.

    Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2000, 20(2):355-368. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Patou J, De Smedt H, van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C: Pathophysiology of nasal obstruction and meta-analysis of early and late effects of levocetirizine.

    Clin Exp Allergy 2006, 36(8):972-981. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Snyman JR, Potter PC, Groenewald M, Levin J, for the Claricort Study Group: Effect of betamethasone-loratadine combination therapy on severe exacerbations of allergic rhinitis: a randomised, controlled trial.

    Clin Drug Investig 2004, 24(5):265-274. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Anolik R, for the Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray with Loratadine Study Group: Clinical benefits of combination treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray and loratadine vs monotherapy with mometasone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008, 100(3):264-271. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Ratner PH, van Bavel JH, Martin BG, Hampel FC Jr, Howland WC, et al.: A comparison of the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and loratadine, alone and in combination, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    J Fam Pract 1998, 47(2):118-125. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  31. Lutsky BN, Klöse P, Melon J, Menardo JL, Molkhou P, et al.: A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of 3- to 6-year-old children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    Clin Ther 1993, 15(5):855-865. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  32. Yang YH, Lin YT, Lu MY, Tsai MJ, Chiang BL: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized study of loratadine (Clarityne) syrup for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children aged 3 to 12 years.

    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2001, 19(3):171-175. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  33. Diaz-Sanchez D, Tsien A, Fleming J, Saxon A: Effect of topical fluticasone propionate on the mucosal allergic response induced by ragweed allergen and diesel exhaust particle challenge.

    Clin Immunol 1999, 90(3):313-322. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Tillmann HC, Stuck BA, Feuring M, Rossol-Haseroth K, Tran BM, et al.: Delayed genomic and acute nongenomic action of glucocorticosteroids in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    Eur J Clin Invest 2004, 34(1):67-73. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL